HF571: Medical Ethics Defense Act
Create the "medical ethics defense act," creating new legal protections for medical practitioners and health care institutions who refuse to participate in or pay for health care services that violate their ethical, moral, or religious beliefs ('conscience'). The law prohibits discrimination for exercising these rights, shields practitioners and institutions from liability for such refusals, and grants whistleblower protections for reporting violations. It also protects free speech and expressive activities related to medical ethics, sets procedures and penalties for regulatory agencies, and provides remedies for unlawful interference. The Act explicitly maintains emergency medical care requirements and upholds confidentiality laws. Effective July 1, 2026.
Key Points & Impacts
-
Defines 'conscience' for both individuals and entities, and prohibits discrimination against practitioners or institutions refusing services based on conscience objections.
-
Prohibits civil, criminal, and administrative liability for good-faith exercise of conscience by practitioners or health care institutions, including for actions by employees or contractors.
-
Provides whistleblower protections for practitioners or institutions who report suspected violations, participate in proceedings, or disclose information about legal or ethical violations, mismanagement, or patient safety concerns.
-
Prohibits state agencies and licensing boards from reprimanding or revoking licenses/certifications for protected speech or expressive activity unless direct patient harm is proven by clear and convincing evidence.
-
Requires agencies to notify practitioners/institutions within 21 days of complaints regarding protected speech, with a $500/day penalty for noncompliance.
-
Allows civil actions and remedies for unlawful interference with conscience rights, whistleblower protections, or free speech, including injunctive relief, damages, and attorney fees.
-
Clarifies that no additional burden or expense to other providers or institutions is a defense to violating these protections, and that other legal rights and remedies remain intact.
-
Explicitly excludes appropriations, focusing on legal rights, liabilities, and penalties, not on funding or budget allocations.
-
Includes severability clause (so if part of the bill is struck down in the courts, the rest of the bill remains in effect).
Signed by Governor May 19, 2026. Takes effect July 1, 2026.
Senate Amendment (H-8174): Amendment H-8174 does not replace HF 571’s core idea (protecting conscience-based refusals), but it refines definitions, clarifies limits, and adjusts legal processes and protections. Specifically: refines key terms like “conscience,” “health care service,” and who is covered; helps specify when protections apply and to whom; tweaks scope of refusal rights by adjusting how broadly providers can decline to participate in care and narrowing which activities count as protected refusals; modifies how lawsuits or claims can be brought under the bill; clarifies who can sue and what damages or relief are available; and refines whistleblower/free speech provision by adjusting protections for providers who speak out about practices or disclose information tied to conscience objections; updates wording and cross-references throughout the bill; and ensures the amended version is legally consistent.
Last Modified: 05/20/2026